Nature transient and distributed on the Web, together with the non-unitary but procedural document web, presupposes and requires an infrastructure composed of various underground services, the value of which is not individual but collective because it depends on their complex and their integration: Internet Archive (for the "preservation" means the digital recording time of changes and developments of sites), Webcare (which does the same thing but by the same authors), Spurl (which - perhaps more effective than other typical products of 2.0 - collect and organize and share is above all rediscover the scoring of bookmarks), CiteSeerX (for the dissemination of scientific content) or providential Google cache, which contrasts the infamous link rot "Error 404. File Not Found, "and others. All services designed to provide stability to the system and tend to return to scoring single dissemination of resources and sources.
But the Web has at the same time also an inherently and spontaneously organization that can give individuality to items scattered on the ground that any unit is often made up of fragments unified ad hoc and therefore the need to unify and for purposes and in different ways: one page HTML can in support, hold - or refer to, around the world - PDF files, images, sound events, slide shows or video , blogs, RSS, or raw data organized in data tables, and so on.
This is possible because the information system of the Web no longer wishes to represent reality "outside" (like a traditional document and how it makes a database), but as object information system, contains objects - digital documents - which are no longer symbolic forms of events that make up the representation of a reality system-independent, but represent only themselves, are part of reality and indeed they are reality itself, reality appears to us only because cohesive metadata (contextual representation of facts "outside" in one area, however, object) can somehow be the "glue" that binds them, even though she was employed, the digital documents in the totality of the information system. Incidentally, this is the "revolution" of the Internet: an information system that replaces the "real" reality ...
On the one hand, therefore, is through a range of services, the other is through the very nature aggregative-diffusive Web document that is allowed a certain amount certainty of resources and sources.
complicate the picture: if a sentient being can easily, even at the end of a process is sometimes not easy to perceive and then dominate the boundaries and linkages of these fragments, it is not so easy to do when the field is to be an agent automatic, which must distinguish perinde ac cadaver chains of a given cognitive domain from other aggregates interesting or not specifically belonging to different ontologies. This is the problem posed by Pavel Dmitriev in his PhD dissertation at Cornell University in January 2008, As We May Perceive: Finding the boundaries of compound documents on the Web . Almost in response to this challenge, OAI (Open Archives Initiative ) has just created ORE (Object Reuse and Exchange), a project of drafting legislation to define and find aggregations of Web resources through the introduction of a special resource map , REM, a unit that describes precisely the borders of the fragments and bonds - for example, and the most famous: arXiv.org REM inside a repository, maintained by a very large group funded by Cornell.
go ahead, but if it were outside the ReM archive? In this case it would be subject to the same transient and fluctuations of the Web: missing pages, URL moved, content changed over time, compared management of a "democratic" and distributed, which is typical these days from 2.0. Helps here Herbert van de Sompel , formerly of Ghent and now Los Alamos National Laboratory and inventor of the 'open URL link resolver , who with others has created the "Remember", REM outside listing the aggregate resource (HR) aggregation that replenish lost and include descriptive metadata for each AR:
The beauty of REM is hoped that could get excited de Sompel, can effectively be created by anyone with a minimum of human organization and therefore costs, "the Commons". Again, the identity (and identification and identification) of the author may take second place to the benefit of collaborative work but also for the benefit of products "grown up" virtually alone, autocrats (author, auctus from vogue, increase - Criminal Law perhaps speak of "author-mediated," but: there are really authors 'unique'? And how do we, in this case, the protection of copyright , even if Dublin Core [1] provides definitions and all in all pretty tautological interchange Figures author, creator, contributor, editor, publisher )? In fact, OAE 6 de Sompel has never spoken, although having of "scientific papers", but only and always dataset as integral parts of an unidentified " scientific record", for which reason could be the anyone editor of a scientific publication.
Anyone working on a REM, of course. This requires a rethinking of the traditional functions of the scientific community itself, its rules and its mapping, which is challenging the canons of traditional valuation metrics such as citations, for example, and then the functions of peer reviewing . Even beyond the traditional scientific journals, being transformed into enhanced journal as "publications liquid" proposed by the group-Daffodil-Marchese Casati (see under Liquefaction in "the Librarian" 3 / 2008, p. 137-138).
Among the first applications of the OAI-ORE - apart from the successful outcome of the control of the citations in JSTOR, the online historical archive of major scholarly journals in the seventeenth century - is to keep an eye www.myexperiment. org , a collaborative environment where scientists and researchers can safely publish their workflows, their items (or collections of objects) and test digital research projects, sharing with the group or finding related groups: a Facebook or MySpace so controlled, protected and reserved, but for which the substance of the (new) authorial relationship does not change
But the Web has at the same time also an inherently and spontaneously organization that can give individuality to items scattered on the ground that any unit is often made up of fragments unified ad hoc and therefore the need to unify and for purposes and in different ways: one page HTML can in support, hold - or refer to, around the world - PDF files, images, sound events, slide shows or video , blogs, RSS, or raw data organized in data tables, and so on.
This is possible because the information system of the Web no longer wishes to represent reality "outside" (like a traditional document and how it makes a database), but as object information system, contains objects - digital documents - which are no longer symbolic forms of events that make up the representation of a reality system-independent, but represent only themselves, are part of reality and indeed they are reality itself, reality appears to us only because cohesive metadata (contextual representation of facts "outside" in one area, however, object) can somehow be the "glue" that binds them, even though she was employed, the digital documents in the totality of the information system. Incidentally, this is the "revolution" of the Internet: an information system that replaces the "real" reality ...
On the one hand, therefore, is through a range of services, the other is through the very nature aggregative-diffusive Web document that is allowed a certain amount certainty of resources and sources.
complicate the picture: if a sentient being can easily, even at the end of a process is sometimes not easy to perceive and then dominate the boundaries and linkages of these fragments, it is not so easy to do when the field is to be an agent automatic, which must distinguish perinde ac cadaver chains of a given cognitive domain from other aggregates interesting or not specifically belonging to different ontologies. This is the problem posed by Pavel Dmitriev in his PhD dissertation at Cornell University in January 2008, As We May Perceive: Finding the boundaries of compound documents on the Web . Almost in response to this challenge, OAI (Open Archives Initiative ) has just created ORE (Object Reuse and Exchange), a project of drafting legislation to define and find aggregations of Web resources through the introduction of a special resource map , REM, a unit that describes precisely the borders of the fragments and bonds - for example, and the most famous: arXiv.org REM inside a repository, maintained by a very large group funded by Cornell.
go ahead, but if it were outside the ReM archive? In this case it would be subject to the same transient and fluctuations of the Web: missing pages, URL moved, content changed over time, compared management of a "democratic" and distributed, which is typical these days from 2.0. Helps here Herbert van de Sompel , formerly of Ghent and now Los Alamos National Laboratory and inventor of the 'open URL link resolver , who with others has created the "Remember", REM outside listing the aggregate resource (HR) aggregation that replenish lost and include descriptive metadata for each AR:
"Remember Attempts to harness the collective abilities of the Web community for preservation Purposes INSTEAD OF Solely Placing the burden of curatorial Responsibilities on a small number of experts."Giving account of his invention in the recent six OAI in Geneva (17-19 June 2009) with Everyone is a curator: human-assisted preservation for ORE Aggregations where curator and everyone are the keyword de Sompel argues that the application to a set of online references mixed with simple references to web sites, allows for separate successfully from each other: using a semi-automatic and a low-cost services to the stability of the above.
The beauty of REM is hoped that could get excited de Sompel, can effectively be created by anyone with a minimum of human organization and therefore costs, "the Commons". Again, the identity (and identification and identification) of the author may take second place to the benefit of collaborative work but also for the benefit of products "grown up" virtually alone, autocrats (author, auctus from vogue, increase - Criminal Law perhaps speak of "author-mediated," but: there are really authors 'unique'? And how do we, in this case, the protection of copyright , even if Dublin Core [1] provides definitions and all in all pretty tautological interchange Figures author, creator, contributor, editor, publisher )? In fact, OAE 6 de Sompel has never spoken, although having of "scientific papers", but only and always dataset as integral parts of an unidentified " scientific record", for which reason could be the anyone editor of a scientific publication.
Anyone working on a REM, of course. This requires a rethinking of the traditional functions of the scientific community itself, its rules and its mapping, which is challenging the canons of traditional valuation metrics such as citations, for example, and then the functions of peer reviewing . Even beyond the traditional scientific journals, being transformed into enhanced journal as "publications liquid" proposed by the group-Daffodil-Marchese Casati (see under Liquefaction in "the Librarian" 3 / 2008, p. 137-138).
Among the first applications of the OAI-ORE - apart from the successful outcome of the control of the citations in JSTOR, the online historical archive of major scholarly journals in the seventeenth century - is to keep an eye www.myexperiment. org , a collaborative environment where scientists and researchers can safely publish their workflows, their items (or collections of objects) and test digital research projects, sharing with the group or finding related groups: a Facebook or MySpace so controlled, protected and reserved, but for which the substance of the (new) authorial relationship does not change
No comments:
Post a Comment