Dark Bump On Butthole

Oh no, this time I run. It took the Mara Carfagna on duty with his utterances of Menga and yet another publicity cabbage feminists wake up from hibernation. One thing I do not understand certain social categories - pass me the term - is that for social emancipation from ghetto to which they are "victims" do not miss an opportunity - with outdoor events, ideologies - in their own ghetto. An example is perhaps the most uplifting of Gay Pride. Homosexuals say that sexual orientation can not and should not be a discriminating factor in social, occupational, political, religious. Beautiful, fantastic, obviously we all agree! And to say this - sacrosanct - what principle are they doing? Organize an event that, for beautiful, colorful and harmless it is, is only meant to bring together gay and lesbian people in a giant group detached from the rest of the world. "We are homosexuals, we have a pride." Meanwhile, However, under the pretext of claiming your equality to the rest of mankind, you'll be separated by only highlighting the differences, even if ephemeral and not worthy of representing a strong social distinction. Thus obtaining the opposite effect.
The same think happens to the females from the front line of battle. They want equal opportunity, equal dignity, all things absolutely right. But then they end up distorting the meaning of their battles, making it a battle of sex, that it is precisely the distinction that you would like to eliminate from the debate! For example, in the political solution to the discrimination against women, which is undeniable, it was the so-called "quote rosa". All happy, all happy and if some party leaders do not ensure that those odds are met then you see that casino comes out. But this is ghettoized themselves, this is because you remind the world that women pretend your party to the sound of fighting there has been granted by the company. The way I see it, the solution really regardless of sex, race, religion, etc. ... in this example would be "put capable people within the parties." In this view there is no distinction of any kind. Another question is "We have started in 100 men and 50 women, we would like to correspond with the rose." This is an allotment based on a calculation which distinguishes all right, whatever, without considering the merits of the capacity but each one based on sex, which is the discriminating factor to remove. Understand the problem?

Now, it makes me laugh enough that both the Minister Carfagna - former model and showgirl on the timetable for horny truckers, will never forget - both groups of feminists is convinced scaglino against the advertising of a bitter because, in their view, "detrimental to the dignity of women. " I stand a couple of questions: where were the feminists when Carfagna was appointed Minister for unspecified merits? Where were they when President Berlusconi proposed as a solution to the insecurity of a young woman to marry a rich man? And while we're at, where it was when they were discovered Carfagna's harem of whores for the consumption Rider, paid for with diamonds and thousands - even millions - of € when women have normal blood spitting from morning to evening for a pitiful wage as everyone else?
situations to get angry with knowledge of the facts there would be a wagon, but they are outraged by an advertisement that, ultimately, does nothing but return a very current theme or the arrival of certain categories of women who simply take advantage of the libido powerful. Speaking of women's dignity is right, get angry when it is to be pissed off too, but until they are angry with Ruby, the D'Addario and macros else is just hypocrisy. If a man can buy a woman means that there are women willing to sell, and as long as there are women willing to sell this is an issue inseparable from our social life. Whether it's an advertisement or any other thing
If you do not say loud and clear that the problem is not only Berlusconi who buys but also willing to sell is just hypocrisy.
Unless it is stated that the problem is not only the commercial but the social situation that obviously inspired it, it means that we have not understood anything.